Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Football and Sewing
I will admit that sometimes, some weeks and even some seasons, I’m less into it all. But it occurred to me last night that spending all day Saturday in front of the TV watching football means I can also be spending all day Saturday sewing. I won’t have to feel like I’m missing time reading or that I should be doing housework or any number of other pursuits, with respect either to the watching of the greatest game or the sewing projects. If I do both, I’m multi-tasking, and that absolutely trumps any singular activity I could engage in instead.
So I’ll be watching all the games this season. And sewing while I do it. And if that’s not a Project Runway editorial combination of “hard” and “soft”/”masculine” and “feminine” to a hilarious degree, situationally speaking….
Now if I can just control my drinking-with-football habit, I've got it made!
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Embroidery Part 1
But the stitching isn't hard, and I think my execution is as good as I could hope for. My design is (and this is another surprise) very obviously mine. I adapted some pictures of embroidery out of my Kyoto history of fashion tome, only because my domicile of guest abode had no internet--unexpected event--so I couldn't access any of the patterns I had found online. What I adapted looks so much like the way I always painted flowers in high school art it's uncanny. I guess I have a solid vision of the world, artisitically speaking, and it's still the same ten years later. I don't know whether to be pleased or dismayed. At least my drawing style translates decently well into basic embroidery shapes....
I'll post pictures after I'm done of the pattern, the pattern transferred onto the fabric, and the finished version. I don't want to jinx anything in the meantime, though. So no pictures for now.
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Embroidery Conundrum
Honestly, the bigger questions I had were the most simple of all:
So once I got those questions answered, it was time to decide what, exactly, I want to embroider. First embroidery project is the red dupioni silk that will cover my stays, because I can't find any black lace that does not look cheap and plastic to sew on as per my original plan. I have to embroider the fabric before I can cut it, and I am going on a road trip this weekend and expect at least one of the 6-hour drives to be in daylight and thus prime time to work by hand.
I was looking at styles of embroidery today, and I found two styles that I like, and I don't know which one to use.
Con - It is not period appropriate (it was popular in Elizabethan times but had fallen out of use by the 18th century)
Pro - It would mimic the lace-covered look I wanted originally
Con - It works better on gridded fabric, which mine is not
Pro - It is essentially outlining patterns rather than "drawing" with thread and filling them in, which is harder to keep looking nice (case in point 99% of the embroidery how-to books on the market)
Con - Its pattern would be exceedingly difficult to transfer by hand (and since my fabric is not on a grid it would have to be traced onto the fabric)
Pro - It is a graphic design style of repetition and interlocking that I have worked with and enjoyed working with on paper
Satin Stitch Embroidery (AKA regular filled embroidery)
Con - It would not give me the lace effect I wanted originally
Pro - It is period appropriate
Con - It will require an original freeform design
Pro - It is the kind of embroidery I'll have to use on his waistcoat so this would be good practice
Pro - It would be equally easy on non-gridded fabric as it would be on gridded
Pro - The pattern would be easier to transfer onto the fabric than a blackwork interlocking repetition pattern
Sigh. I think I just talked myself into the free-form satin-stitch. It's for the best, really it is...and I would be disappointed, I think, whichever way I chose. One path cuts off the other, simple as that, and I want both right now.
So. Now I just need to find a pattern that is appropriately dramatic, suited to the space and shape it will go, and work-able in a monochromatic design (black silk on red silk only). Maybe my artist mum can help me with that this weekend....
Here's some thoughts of things I like but why this exact pattern wouldn't work:
Middle section only - still too wideThe part on the coat - has no centerpiece
Would not work in black only but isn't that utter gorgeousness?
Sunday, August 8, 2010
Say Yes to the Dress
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
Almost Met My Deadline!
Stay tuned!
Monday, August 2, 2010
Maybe Brilliantly Played, Costume Designer
Anyway, I was looking at my images of Stanze's bodice, and I had a moment of synthesis that might make her dress even more brilliantly made than its look alone is. Observe the seaming:
See how the bodice is constructed of nothing but strips a few inches wide, except for the front panel? This could be about the tailoring so that it will fit all her contours perfectly, but....
First, I have learned in my research that fabric consumption was VERY conservative. You can see from a few extant old patterns how almost every scrap of fabric was used--very unlike today, which will tell you to buy an extra 2 yards in order to cut everything along the bias or something. Tailors in the old days did not give two shits about bias cuts or grain cuts or anything like that; they cared about fitting as many parts of their pattern onto that rectangle of fabric as they possibly could. Second, Stanze and Mozart were middle-class, rather than aristocratic or rich enough to be the equivalent, so I'm wondering if Stanze's bodice isn't constructed that way to imply it was made in part with scraps, as a money-saving device?
I will never know why the decision was made, of course, since there is not a book about the costuming of Amadeus, but if her dress was meant to suggest something about their financial situation and Stanze's thriftiness in taking a dress made with what might not have seemed like enough fabric...then that's brilliant.